...For well over a half-century, the nation's liberals and progressives … have waged war on traditions, customs and moral values. ...there are no moral absolutes, to our young people. To them, what's moral or immoral is a matter of convenience, personal opinion, or a consensus. … Customs, traditions, moral values and rules of etiquette, not laws and government regulations, are what make for a civilized society. … The importance of customs, traditions and moral values as a means of regulating behavior is that people behave themselves even if nobody's watching. Police and laws can never replace these restraints on personal conduct so as to produce a civilized society.
Walter E. Williams
In
recent history there has been a constant assault upon the Second
Amendment and the unalienable
and natural right
for law abiding citizens to protect themselves against predators that
prey upon society, especially when they know the victims are unarmed
and unable to fight back.
Despite the US Supreme Court finally agreeing and decreeing that the
Second Amendment means what the short paragraph says.
There
are those who argue that the Second Amendment is outdated [as they
claim much of the rest of the Constitution and amendments are], and
there is no need for a militia. Then why doesn't the state and
federal authorities disband the National and State Guard? In reality,
and it tune with the Second Amendment – every citizen is a member
of a militia who may be called upon to defend the Constitution, its
amendments, their property, their community, family and friends. In
truth, it is We
the People
that is the “Homeland Security”. Yet, the past two
administrations have developed a fear about people being armed and
rising up against the self-appointed [although elected] officials
because of their draconian attitudes and unconstitutional
legislation, regulations, and executive orders.
If
one looks from outside
the box,
in an objective manner, knowing constitutional law, the reasons why
the Founders decided upon those articles and amendments, is because a
government, those charged with operating a government, will not fear
the people unless they are practicing tyranny and committing
unconstitutional acts. No legitimate and constitutional government
need fear the people, for a constitutional government can certainly
expect support By the People when the government is For the People.
But,
as the quotation of Walter
E. Williams
clearly shows, our problems today are not just of those who operate
OUR government, but within society itself.
Laws that forbid the carrying of arms … disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. … Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants.
Cesare Beccaria
Our Founding Fathers were determined to ensure that the people had
rights to keep and bear arms, so much so that they listed it as the
second amendment. The Founders were students of history and
understood that from antiquity to present, an armed citizenry was
essential to preserve freedom as well as defend the homeland
alongside the established army. A government that insists upon
disarming the people, as history shows over and over, is a government
who intends tyranny and eventually take away other liberties.
When the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man, who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually.
George Mason of Virginia, 1788
The recent progressive-liberal Congress, specifically the US Senate
under the incentive of Senators Dianne Feinstein and Harry Reid [Obama and others], a bill was
produced to ban a large number (150) of firearms from public use, as
well as limitations upon magazine quantities. That did not succeed,
so being determined to undermine the Constitution [despite Feinstein
stating at a hearing that she was aware of what is in the
Constitution], the progressive-liberals set out to undermine the
Second Amendment in a sneaky way – by making it harder to purchase
ammunition, especially in large quantities. Most people purchase
larger quantities because it is cheaper in the long run if they are a
regular visitor to the firing range and/or attend sporting
competitions. Still others are stockpiling because of fear of what
the progressive-socialists are actually doing. They are not paranoid,
but trying to be prepaid for the worst; thus why people call them
“preppers” nowadays.
Whether purchasing a firearm and ammunition for sport, hunting,
plinking, or preparing for a possible break down of the system – it
is all within the rights of the Second Amendment. Today's society
[too many] are not aware that if one amendment falls, others will
follow; and know so little about the Constitution and its amendments,
they actually believe that healthcare and other welfare benefits are
their constitutional right – making someone else pay for it. Thus,
what Walter E. Williams said about society making a civilized nation
is truth and is breaking down before our eyes.
Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? It is feared, then, that we shall turn our arms each man against his own bosom. Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords, and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American … The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people.
Tench Cowe, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb 20th, 1788
The argument then remains the same today, just that the advance of
firearms being drastically different. We the People agreed that the
federal government not allow certain weaponry into the hands of the
common people, such as rocket launchers, artillery, mortar weaponry
and firearms that have continuous fire unless they register it and
obtain permission to do so for those who collect and museums who want
such weaponry. However, switch blade knives and sawed-off shotguns
should not be on the list. It is senseless and not adhering to the
mindset that initiated such a ban in the first place.
The
AR-15, [“AR” = Armalite
Rifle,
not Assault Rifle]
model of semiautomatic, along with AR-10, AR-30, and AR-50 are legal
weapons; and should be. This weapon, civilian version of the military
M16, M16A1, and M16A2; is the weapon of choice for a number of
reasons, chiefly: (1) ease of operation; (2) light, but strong and
dependable; (3) easy to maintain and reliable. It's ammunition
(.223/5.65mm) is relatively inexpensive, but gets the job done. Other
versions of the AR come in .308/7.62mm; but those are chiefly for
those who like the AR style and dependability and want to use it for
hunting large game. The 7.62 is used in sniper rifles and medium machine guns [M60] in the US Armed Forces. It has become a traditional
choice of firearm enthusiasts and patriots across America.
What
was once the American mainstay firearm, the Kentucky 'Long' Rifle; it
is now the AR-15 with various configurations and customizations.
The
frontier family, the American colonists under British rule, were
familiar with the Kentucky rifle, which was made in Pennsylvania in
the towns of Lancaster and Reading, primarily. Called the 'Long
Rifle' initially because of the barrel length, later famous
frontiersmen like Daniel Boone made the rifle famous and came to be
known as the Kentucky Rifle.
The
gunsmiths who made these long-range, accurate rifles were the
Pennsylvania Dutch [actually they were German, but were called
Pennsylvania Dutch
because in those days anyone from Germany were called Dutch. Germans
had made the finest rifles in Europe, and immigrants brought that
talent to the American colonies. One-third of the population in
Pennsylvania was German.
The
Kentucky Rifle was a flintlock muzzle-loading firearm with a rifled
barrel [thus the name 'rifle'] that was from three to four feet long.
The long barrel increased muzzle velocity, had improved sighting, and
so could hit a target with more accuracy and greater distance than
what the British soldier was using, called Brown
Bess.
When the American Revolution began, the British soldiers were being
picked off before their issued rifles could be in range of the
American colonial militia. The bullet was heavier than the British,
in .40 or .45 caliber sizes, which caused more damage when it hit
something and not too heavy to travel long distances. It was
especially useful when hunting for game for the dinner table.
Shooting
contests became a regular frontier pastime from New England to
Georgia; thus the American militiaman was an accomplished marksman
where a British soldier, drafted from the cities of England, never
firing a rifle until practicing in the King's army, had the
disadvantage along with the range problem.
American
riflemen could snuff
out a candle
or drive the nail
at
70 paces, and did so in competitions. The flintlock has one major
problem – the percussion cap was not invented yet. It involved
extra steps in loading and firing. Dampness and fouling with dirty
black powder in the pan caused misfires and hangfire. This could be
life threatening when in battle with the enemy. Reloading usually
took about one minute on the average, the best riflemen could do it
in 30 seconds. Thirty seconds is a long time when British troops or
an enraged bear was charging.
But
still, the Kentucky Rifle was still better than the British Brown
Bess. The British called the Kentucky Rifle the widow-maker,
and rightly so.
That
rifle, although waning, is still popular among those who collect
antique firearms, Reenactments, or enjoy hunting with muzzle loaders that are modern versions of the same
rifle in percussion cap or the new electronic ignition system. Either
way, the Kentucky Rifle must still be muzzle loaded and fired as a
single shot rifle.
The
Kentucky Rifle, what was to the frontiersman and militia of the
1700s, is now the AR-15 rifle today; but all fall under the
tradition, constitutional law under the Second Amendment – the
right to keep and
bear arms.
Some
groups have provided the American militia a bad name with the help of
the media; however there are constitutional militia groups out there
who form in comradeship, tradition, swearing to protect and defend
the Constitution of the United States against enemies, foreign and
domestic, and who hold the same honor and heritage that the Minute
Man
of the American Revolutionary War held. Their clothing and firearms
may be different, but the gist of what they are about remain the
same. They believe in their communities and working with, not
against, the county sheriffs and law enforcement individuals.
Those
that hold power in our federal and state government should be looking
at these Americans, men and women, as allied militia, ready to help
defend and protect themselves and their fellow citizens against
criminal predators within the confines of constitutional law – not
the law of the mob or the elite that has taken root and gained power
over the People. The constitutional militia are not vigilantes, but
part of the honor, traditions and heritage of the United States of
America.
Whereas civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms.
Tench Cowe, Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789
The
same goes with the NRA (National Rifle Association) that honors
tradition and the Second Amendment and encouraging citizens to be
responsible firearm owners and exercising established safety
standards whether they are at the range, in competition, or carrying
a concealed weapon with a permit.
With
every freedom and liberty, there comes responsibility; as well as the
duty to protect those rights and liberties.
Citizens
that do not wish to own or handle firearms have the right to make
that choice; however, they do not have the right to demand that other
lawful citizens not exercise their Second Amendment rights.
The
Pennsylvania 'Kentucky' Rifle was the weapon of choice in the 1700s,
but today, the weapon of choice among Americans is the AR-15.
The
weaponry changed, but the heritage and US Constitution should not
change with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
No SPAM, please. If you wish to advertise or promote website, contact me.