GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN: During the
government shutdown, allegedly only key essential departments will be
operating at full scale, which means that law enforcement will be
running as usual and the important NICS operations will be operating.
The NICS [National
Instant Criminal Background Check System] is essential to
performing background checks for firearm purchases. Thus far there
have been no impact as far as slowing down response times within the
NICS system.
The government
shutdown has affected other areas, like ministers to Catholics on
military bases are not permitted to perform their duties, not even if
they volunteer. Maggie at Maggie's
Notebook stated that contract priests have been threatened
with arrest if they volunteer their spiritual services. So it goes in
the Obama/Progressive administrative world. The question has been
offered:
Will Muslim soldiers be allowed to follow the call to prayer?
The Framers of the Constitution did not
write the law of the land to be circumvented with backdoor
legislation and policies. Politicians have developed a practice for
some time now where they spend more time looking for ways to
circumvent constitutional law rather than abide by it.
Alexander Hamilton – The only constitutional exception to the power of making treaties is that it shall not change the Constitution.
James Madison – I do not conceive that power is given to the President or the Senate to dismember the empire, or alienate any great, essential right. I do not think the whole legislative authority to have this power.
Thomas Jefferson – I say the same as to the opinion of those who consider the grant of treaty-making power to be boundless. If it is, then we have no Constitution.
Supremacy Clause: This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Clearly
Kerry and Obama's assumption that they can legislate by using a
ratified [or un-ratified] treaty is clearly not the intent of the
Framers of the US Constitution, which in this case involves the
Second Amendment. They have promised that by signing an anti-Second
Amendment treaty agreement that it will not affect the rights of US
citizens. But where have we heard such promises before? Remember the
push to pass the so-called Obamacare legislation, and how they
promised it would be good for citizens and save them money dealing
with health care?
The
Framers/Founders did not provide the Federal government the power to
usurp the Constitution via a treaty because the Constitution is the
supreme law of the land, not treaty law.
So
the questions is asked: Why would a president sign a treaty that
countered the US Constitution?
If
the treaty is not in compliance with our constitution, why sign an
agreement that acts against the fundamental rights and natural law of
other people in other nations be agreed to? In effect, that is what
Obama and company are doing.
Don't piss on my back and tell me it's raining.
OTHER
NEWS:
Colorado
DA Refuses to Prosecute Flood Victims for Private Firearm Transfers
… NRA warned that the Colorado House
Bill 1229
would broadly criminalize the private transfer of firearms between
law-abiding citizens.
In
California
– NRA
intends to file suit against Governor Brown if he signs
unconstitutional semi-automatic firearm ban legislation.
In
Connecticut
– Law
Requiring “Ammunition Certificate” to Purchase Ammunition and
Magazines Takes Effect Tomorrow.
The oldest firearm manufactures in US is located in Connecticut. Will
they remain in a state that counters the Second Amendment?
In
Montana
– On October 1st,
the following laws take effect: Senate
Bill 145
that ensures confidentiality and privacy protection for concealed
weapon permit holders; House
Bill 446
deletes “discharge of firearms” from the disorderly conduct
statute; House
Bill 459
provides that health care facilities and providers may not inquire
about a person's firearm ownership as a condition of receiving
medical treatment nor refuse treatment because a person refuses to
answer questions about firearms ownership. This is an important
counter against the Affordable
Health Care Act,
infamously known as Obamacare,
where such practices would take affect because of the law being
poorly written and unconstitutional.
In
North Carolina –
Pro-gun
reform bill took effect that reforms the handgun purchase permit
process and makes several improvements for gun owners and sportsmen.
No comments:
Post a Comment
No SPAM, please. If you wish to advertise or promote website, contact me.